# Meniscus Diagram Of The Knee

best of meniscus diagram of the knee or normal knee anatomy 54 meniscus muscles knee.

good meniscus diagram of the knee and diagram depicting a healthy knee joint and one with a torn meniscus 59 knee meniscus diagram.

idea meniscus diagram of the knee and 15 meniscus anatomy knee.

good meniscus diagram of the knee or 94 meniscus knee diagram.

elegant meniscus diagram of the knee and preventing injury through strengthening exercises knee muscles anatomy knee joint anatomy anatomy of 99 knee meniscus parts.

luxury meniscus diagram of the knee or image showing knee anatomy and torn meniscus 19 knee meniscus structure and function.

luxury meniscus diagram of the knee or 32 knee meniscus parts.

good meniscus diagram of the knee and anatomical model meniscus tears of the knee 82 meniscus function knee.

good meniscus diagram of the knee for anatomical model meniscus tears of the knee 62 knee meniscus diagram.

unique meniscus diagram of the knee or human knee joint anatomy of the knee menisci of the knee medial meniscus 41 meniscus knee anatomy.

good meniscus diagram of the knee for normal anatomy of the knee 15 knee meniscus structure and function.

unique meniscus diagram of the knee and the coronary ligaments of the medial meniscus are 36 knee meniscus anatomy radiology.

meniscus diagram of the knee for the medial and lateral meniscus divided up 29 meniscus knee anatomy.

awesome meniscus diagram of the knee for knee anatomy 56 meniscus knee diagram.

lovely meniscus diagram of the knee and meniscus 87 knee meniscus structure.

ideas meniscus diagram of the knee and injured knee joint with torn meniscus vector chart 75 meniscus muscles knee.

ideas meniscus diagram of the knee for 34 lateral meniscus knee anatomy.

beautiful meniscus diagram of the knee and anatomy of a meniscus in the healthy human knee joint peripheral 19 meniscus anatomy knee.

fresh meniscus diagram of the knee for vector illustration of a proximal surface of tibia in a healthy human knee joint and unhealthy 86 lateral meniscus knee anatomy.

new meniscus diagram of the knee for knee meniscus anatomy lateral view 68 meniscus anatomy knee.

Logician John Venn developed the Venn diagram in complement to Eulers concept. His diagram rules were more rigid than Eulers - each set must show its connection with all other sets within the union, even if no objects fall into this category. This is why Venn diagrams often only contain 2 or 3 sets, any more and the diagram can lose its symmetry and become overly complex. Venn made allowances for this by trading circles for ellipses and arcs, ensuring all connections are accounted for whilst maintaining the aesthetic of the diagram.

Usage for Venn diagrams has evolved somewhat since their inception. Both Euler and Venn diagrams were used to logically and visually frame a philosophical concept, taking phrases such as some of x is y, all of y is z and condensing that information into a diagram that can be summarized at a glance. They are used in, and indeed were formed as an extension of, set theory - a branch of mathematical logic that can describe objects relations through algebraic equation. Now the Venn diagram is so ubiquitous and well ingrained a concept that you can see its use far outside mathematical confines. The form is so recognizable that it can shown through mediums such as advertising or news broadcast and the meaning will immediately be understood. They are used extensively in teaching environments - their generic functionality can apply to any subject and focus on my facet of it. Whether creating a business presentation, collating marketing data, or just visualizing a strategic concept, the Venn diagram is a quick, functional, and effective way of exploring logical relationships within a context.

The structure of this humble diagram was formally developed by the mathematician John Venn, but its roots go back as far as the 13th Century, and includes many stages of evolution dictated by a number of noted logicians and philosophers. The earliest indications of similar diagram theory came from the writer Ramon Llull, whos initial work would later inspire the German polymath Leibnez. Leibnez was exploring early ideas regarding computational sciences and diagrammatic reasoning, using a style of diagram that would eventually be formalized by another famous mathematician. This was Leonhard Euler, the creator of the Euler diagram.

Euler diagrams are similar to Venn diagrams, in that both compare distinct sets using logical connections. Where they differ is that a Venn diagram is bound to show every possible intersection between sets, whether objects fall into that class or not; a Euler diagram only shows actually possible intersections within the given context. Sets can exist entirely within another, termed as a subset, or as a separate circle on the page without any connections - this is known as a disjoint. Furthering the example outlined previously, if a new set was introduced - birds - this would be shown as a circle entirely within the confines of the mammals set (but not overlapping sea life). A fourth set of trees would be a disjoint - a circle without any connections or intersections.

A Venn diagram, sometimes referred to as a set diagram, is a diagramming style used to show all the possible logical relations between a finite amount of sets. In mathematical terms, a set is a collection of distinct objects gathered together into a group, which can then itself be termed as a single object. Venn diagrams represent these objects on a page as circles or ellipses, and their placement in relation to each other describes the relationships between them. Commonly a Venn diagram will compare two sets with each other. In such a case, two circles will be used to represent the two sets, and they are placed on the page in such a way as that there is an overlap between them. This overlap, known as the intersection, represents the connection between sets - if for example the sets are mammals and sea life, then the intersection will be marine mammals, e.g. dolphins or whales. Each set is taken to contain every instance possible of its class; everything outside the union of sets (union is the term for the combined scope of all sets and intersections) is implicitly not any of those things - not a mammal, does not live underwater, etc.